iemaconsultants.com

A Comprehensive Analysis of Multilayer Greenhouse Systems with Ventilated and Evaporative Cooling Air Gaps

Enhancing Thermal Performance in Greenhouse Multilayer Insulation, Ventilation, and Evaporative Cooling

Abstract

In regions characterized by extreme solar irradiance and high ambient temperatures, greenhouse operations must overcome significant thermal challenges. This paper presents an in‐depth investigation of a novel multilayer greenhouse system engineered to minimize cooling loads and optimize indoor climate stability. The study systematically examines a progression from a conventional single-layer enclosure to a dual-layer configuration with an air gap, further augmented by active ventilation and evaporative cooling. Analytical derivations of thermal transmittance (U-value) and solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) for each configuration are coupled with dynamic simulations using Carrier’s Hourly Analysis Program (HAP). The outcomes demonstrate up to a 45% reduction in cooling load relative to the baseline, thereby offering compelling evidence for the system’s potential to contribute to sustainable energy practices.

Introduction

Controlled-environment agriculture increasingly demands innovations that mitigate extreme heat gains while reducing energy consumption. In hot and arid climates such as Thatta, Pakistan, traditional greenhouse designs often suffer from excessive internal temperatures due to high solar irradiance. To address these challenges, a multilayer system is proposed in which an additional interior glazing layer is added to a conventional greenhouse, creating an air gap. Subsequent integration of active ventilation and evaporative cooling further enhances thermal regulation. This paper systematically examines the impact of these modifications by:

  1. Baseline Single-Layer Enclosure : A conventional greenhouse using 10 mm UV-resistant polycarbonate sheets.
  2. Dual-Layer Configuration: The addition of an interior glazing layer creates an insulating air gap, reducing conductive and radiative heat gains.
  3. Ventilated Air Gap: Active ventilation is introduced within the air cavity to improve convective heat removal.
  4. Evaporative Cooling Integration: A misting system is applied in the outer layer to harness latent cooling, further reducing internal temperatures.

Methodology

Calculating baseline U-values and SHGC for a single-layer greenhouse.

Determining the effective thermal and solar properties for a dual-layer system with an air gap.

Incorporating ventilation effects using empirical and ASHRAE-based methods.

Assessing the additional cooling benefits of evaporative cooling in the ventilated cavity.

2.1 System Configuration and Material Properties

  • Glazing Material: The primary construction uses 10 mm UV‐resistant polycarbonate sheets with a reported U-value of 0.577 BTU/hr·ft²·°F and an inherent SHGC of 0.887

 

  • Geometry:
    • Exterior Layer:35 ft × 51 ft x 25ft
    • Interior Layer: 20ft × 51 ftx 21ft (oriented perpendicularly).
    • Air Gap: 10582 ft³ for a 51-ft length.

2.2 Analytical Calculation of Thermal Properties

2.2.1 Baseline (Single-Layer Greenhouse)
  • U-value: 0.577 BTU/hr·ft²·°F.
  • SHGC: 0.887.
  • Cooling Load: Baseline design requires approximately 60 tons of cooling.
2.2.2 Dual-Layer System (Static Air Gap)

The overall thermal resistance Rtotalof a composite wall is given by:

 +Rair-gap+

whereU1​ and U2​ are the U-values of the outer and inner glazing, and Rair-gapis derived from ISO 6946 standards. The effective U-value is then:

Ucombined

The corresponding SHGC is adjusted to account for the dual-layer transmission.

2.2.3 Ventilated Air Gap

Ventilation introduces convective heat removal, thereby lowering the effective U-value. This is expressed as:

Umodified =Upolycarbonate×(1−η)

whereη (Ventilation Effectiveness) is estimated using multiple methods:

  • Simple ACH Method:

For an assumed 5 air changes per hour (ACH) and a constant CCC (typically 0.2–0.5), η is estimated at approximately

  • ASHRAE Air Gap Resistance Approach:
    Empirical convective coefficients (e.g., hin5 and hout1.0BTU/hr·ft²·°F) are used to compute the R-value of the air gap:

This method typically indicates a smaller reduction in U-value if ventilation is low.

  • Empirical Temperature Differential Method:

​Observations indicate that effective ventilation can reduce the temperature difference by 60–70%, corresponding to η≈0.6–0.7.

2.2.4 Ventilated Air Gap with Evaporative Cooling

The addition of evaporative cooling is modelled by introducing an efficiency factor that quantifies the latent cooling effect:

Umodified =Upolycarbonate×(1−(η+ϵ))

Empirical data from psychrometric analyses suggest that, under optimal conditions, evaporative cooling can contribute an additional 10–15°F temperature reduction

 

 

2.3 HAP Simulation

Using Carrier HAP:

  • Weather Data: Customized via Weather Wizard for Thatta, Pakistan.
  • Input Parameters: The calculated U-values and modified SHGC for each configuration are entered. Ventilation rates and latent loads (from evaporative cooling) are specified.
  • Output: Hourly cooling load, indoor temperature profiles, and estimated energy savings.

3. Results

3.1 Summary of Calculated Thermal Properties and Cooling Loads

The table below presents the effective thermal parameters for each configuration, along with the estimated cooling tonnage and relative energy savings versus the baseline (single-layer greenhouse).

Configuration

Effective U-value
(BTU/hr·ft²·°F)

Modified SHGC

Cooling Tonnage (approx.)

Energy
Savings (%)

Single-Layer Greenhouse

0.577

0.887

60 tons (baseline)

0%

Dual-Layer

(Static Air Gap)

~0.412

~0.753

~49 tons

~18%

Ventilated Air Gap
 (ACH Method,

 η ≈ 0.50)

~0.289

~0.650

~42 tons

~30%

Ventilated
 +
 Evaporative Cooling

~0.173

(with η + ε ≈ 0.70)

~0.450

~33 tons

~45%

 

Notes:

  • Cooling Tonnage: Estimates are derived by correlating the reductions in U-value and SHGC with a proportional decrease in the required cooling capacity (baseline ≈ 60 tons).
  • Energy Savings: Represent the percentage reduction in cooling load relative to the single-layer configuration.

3.2 HAP Simulation Outcomes

  • Static Air Gap: Yields an 18% reduction in cooling load (49 tons vs. 60 tons).
  • Ventilated Air Gap: Improves performance further, achieving a 30% reduction (42 tons).
  • Ventilated + Evaporative Cooling: Provides the greatest benefit, with a 45% reduction in cooling load (33 tons), significantly stabilizing the indoor climate and reducing peak temperature by approximately 12°F.

4. Discussion

The sequential implementation of system enhancements illustrates a clear pathway toward reduced thermal loads:

  • Static Air Gap: Provides a passive insulating barrier that lowers conductive heat transfer.
  • Ventilation: Enhances convective heat removal, effectively reducing the U-value.
  • Evaporative Cooling: Leverages latent heat removal to further mitigate heat gains, simultaneously reducing the SHGC.

These findings are supported by analytical calculations, empirical methods, and HAP simulations, aligning with established literature

5. Conclusion

The integration of an interior glazing layer, ventilated air gap, and evaporative cooling within a greenhouse structure offers substantial improvements in thermal management and energy efficiency. The system reduces the effective U-value and SHGC, leading to significant cooling load reductions (up to 45%) and improved microclimate stability. These innovations are particularly beneficial for regions such as Thatta, Pakistan, where high solar radiation and ambient temperatures challenge conventional greenhouse designs. Future research should focus on dynamic simulation studies and field validation to further optimize these strategies.